Original Research

Evaluating COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness during pre-Delta, Delta and Omicron dominant periods among pregnant people in the U.S.: Retrospective cohort analysis from a nationally sampled cohort in National COVID Collaborative Cohort (N3C)

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccinations (initial and booster) during pre-Delta, Delta and Omicron dominant periods among pregnant people via (1) COVID-19 incident and severe infections among pregnant people who were vaccinated versus unvaccinated and (2) post-COVID-19 vaccination breakthrough infections and severe infections among vaccinated females who were pregnant versus non-pregnant.

Design Retrospective cohort study using nationally sampled electronic health records data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative, 10 December 2020 –7 June 2022.

Participants Cohort 1 included pregnant people (15–55 years) and cohort 2 included vaccinated females of reproductive age (15–55 years).

Exposures (1) COVID-19 vaccination and (2) pregnancy.

Main outcome measures Adjusted HRs (aHRs) for COVID-19 incident or breakthrough infections and severe infections (ie, COVID-19 infections with related hospitalisations).

Results In cohort 1, 301 107 pregnant people were included. Compared with unvaccinated pregnant people, the aHRs for pregnant people with initial vaccinations during pregnancy of incident COVID-19 were 0.77 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.96) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.07) and aHRs of severe COVID-19 infections were 0.65 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.90) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.21) during the Delta and Omicron periods, respectively. Compared with pregnant people with full initial vaccinations, the aHR of incident COVID-19 for pregnant people with booster vaccinations was 0.64 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.71) during the Omicron period. In cohort 2, 934 337 vaccinated people were included. Compared with vaccinated non-pregnant females, the aHRs of severe COVID-19 infections for people with initial vaccinations during pregnancy was 2.71 (95% CI 1.31 to 5.60) during the Omicron periods.

Conclusions Pregnant people with initial and booster vaccinations during pregnancy had a lower risk of incident and severe COVID-19 infections compared with unvaccinated pregnant people across the pandemic stages. However, vaccinated pregnant people still had a higher risk of severe infections compared with non-pregnant females.

What is already known on this topic

  • Pregnant people are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes and adverse pregnancy outcomes (eg, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, preterm birth or fetal death).

  • COVID-19 vaccination can reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes and is safe for use among pregnant people.

What this study adds

  • The protective effect of initial COVID-19 vaccines (ie, two doses for mRNA or other vaccines and one dose for the Janssen vaccine) waned down during the Omicron period, but booster vaccines further protected pregnant people from incidents and severe COVID-19 infections during the Omicron period.

  • Vaccinated pregnant people still had a higher risk of severe COVID-19 infections compared with vaccinated non-pregnant people during Delta and Omicron periods.

How this study might affect research, practice or policy

  • Pregnant people should continue to get booster COVID-19 vaccinations and be considered a priority group to get protection interventions during public health crises.

Introduction

COVID-19 vaccines are considered one of the best tools in the global fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. Increasing data suggest that the incidence and severity of COVID-19 infections are lower among vaccinated versus unvaccinated people.1 While breakthrough infections still occurred among vaccinated individuals, particularly during Delta and Omicron variant periods in the USA, their lower frequency and severity may be attributable largely to vaccine effectiveness.2 3

Pregnant people with COVID-19 infections appear to be at higher risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, such as a higher risk of severe pneumonia and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, than non-pregnant people.4 5 Immunological and physiological changes during pregnancy may be driving factors for the overall increased risk.6 Pregnant people with COVID-19 infection may also face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, preterm birth and mortality, than pregnant people without COVID-19 infection.7 8 Furthermore, infections during pregnancy may be associated with potentially adverse long-term outcomes in infants.9 Thus, either avoiding or attenuating severe COVID-19 infections is important for pregnant people.

Generally, vaccinations are well tolerated, safe and effective in pregnancy. For instance, influenza vaccinations have demonstrated effectiveness at preventing influenza infection and are not related to adverse maternal and infant outcomes, such as preterm birth or low birth weight.10–12 Also, emerging data suggest COVID-19 vaccinations are safe for pregnant people without major adverse birth outcomes.13–17 Studies in different settings have also shown COVID-19 vaccines had a protective effect on pregnant people.18–21 However, whether the COVID-19 vaccines work similarly for both pregnant and non-pregnant people have been rarely investigated. While previous research suggested that pregnant people had a higher risk of breakthrough infection compared with non-pregnant females, COVID-19 severity, the stage of the pandemic and the timing of vaccination relative to pregnancy were not accounted for in the analysis.22 With the emergence of different viral variants and evolving immunological changes during pregnancy, the pandemic stages and the timing of vaccination regarding pregnancy may impact the effectiveness of vaccines.

The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) was developed in 2020 to provide an aggregated and harmonised platform for deidentified electronic health record (EHR) data from numerous healthcare sites from all geographic regions in the USA for use in COVID-19 research. Our group has phenotyped pregnant people, their pregnancy episodes as well as gestational ageing and their COVID-19 outcomes in N3C.23 With the largest harmonised EHR data in the USA, we focused on two interconnected questions for this study. First, we aimed to evaluate the extent to which COVID-19 vaccination could reduce the risk of incident and severe COVID-19 infections among pregnant people who were vaccinated versus unvaccinated. Second, we aimed to evaluate whether and how the risk of breakthrough and severe COVID-19 infections would vary among vaccinated females comparing those who were pregnant versus non-pregnant. We stratified both analyses by the stages of the pandemic and vaccination timing regarding pregnancy.

Materials and methods

Overall study setting and design

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of a prospectively collected EHR repository. The N3C consortium is a high-granularity EHR data repository of deidentified, patient-level data from medical centres across the USA. The overall N3C design, data ingestion and harmonisation, and sampling approach have been described previously.24 25 Additional details about N3C and ethical review are in online supplemental materials.

Our dataset included COVID-19 vaccines currently given Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorisation, including two mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273)) and a viral vector vaccine (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen (JNJ-784336725)), as well as other vaccines (eg, AstraZeneca). We categorised initial full vaccination as completion of the recommended dosing regimen of any vaccine (ie, at least two doses for mRNA or other vaccines and one dose for the Janssen vaccine) and partial vaccination as one dose of mRNA vaccine. We categorised any additional doses after 90 days of initial dosing (eg, a third mRNA dose) as booster vaccinations and only accounted for the first booster vaccination in this analysis.26 The concepts and codes to define vaccinations can be found in online supplemental table 1.

Study period and analytical cohort selection

Our study observation period occurred from 10 December 2020 to 7 June 2022. We used N3C data version 84 (released 7 July 2022), noting that we truncated the observation period 1 month earlier to allow for adequate time for data reporting. We defined the beginning of the observation period, 10 December 2020, based on the date the FDA first approved COVID-19 vaccination.27 We chose the end date, 7 June 2022, to allow 90 days prior to when the bivalent booster became available (9 September 2022) so that this analysis amply precludes bivalent booster impact (separate analysis forthcoming).

We stratified the analysis by variants predominant during the pandemic: pre-Delta (10 December 2020, to 20 June 2021), Delta (21 June 2021 to 25 December 2021) and Omicron (26 December 2021 to 7 June 2022), with predominance periods defined based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates for the USA in general.27

Cohort construction and bias control

Figure 1 illustrates our cohort construction. We included data from 43 total contributing sites, excluding sites in the bottom quartile of vaccination rates. Next, we generated subsets of this cohort to identify pregnant people (cohort 1) and vaccinated females (cohort 2).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Flow chart of analytic cohorts selection from the N3C cohort

For the analysis of initial vaccinations with cohort 1, we included pregnant people aged 15–55 with COVID-19 vaccinations during or before their pregnancy on or after 10 December 2020 (ie, the earliest date that COVID-19 vaccination was approved by FDA). For unvaccinated pregnant people, we included those with pregnancy end dates after 1 March 2021. We used 1 March 2021, the first peak of the initial full vaccination date among vaccinated pregnant people, as the ‘proxy initial vaccination date’. Similarly, for the analysis of booster vaccinations with cohort 1, we included pregnant people with a booster vaccination during or before their pregnancy after 1 December 2021. For unvaccinated pregnant people, we included those with pregnancy end dates after 1 December 2021. We used 1 December 2021, the peak of booster vaccination date among vaccinated pregnant people, as the ‘proxy booster vaccination date’. We defined proxy vaccination dates to avoid ascertainment bias in person-time at risk being longer in the unvaccinated versus vaccinated groups.

For analysis of initial and booster vaccinations with cohort 2, we included non-pregnant vaccinated (ie, those initial vaccinations/booster vaccinations) females of reproductive age to match with the pregnant vaccinated (ie, those initial vaccinations/booster vaccinations) females.

Cohort 1 analysis (all pregnant people)

In the analysis for initial and booster vaccinations in cohort 1, we compared vaccinated versus unvaccinated pregnant people aged 15–55 to evaluate the vaccine effectiveness in pregnancy via incident and severe COVID-19 infections. We categorised vaccinated pregnant people based on vaccination timing into four groups: received any initial or booster vaccination during pregnancy (vaccinated during pregnancy) and received all initial or booster vaccinations before pregnancy (vaccinated before pregnancy).

To further investigate the effectiveness of booster vaccinations, we compared pregnant people with full initial vaccinations and those with booster vaccinations via incident and severe COVID-19 infections.

Cohort 2 (all vaccinated females)

In the analysis for initial and booster vaccinations in cohort 2, we compared pregnant people vaccinated during or before pregnancy (same as cohort 1) versus non-pregnant females aged 15–55 to examine the impact of pregnancy on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness.

For both cohorts 1 and 2, we excluded pregnant people with COVID-19 infections after their initial/booster vaccination (or proxy initial/booster vaccination dates) but before pregnancy. In the analysis for booster vaccinations, the included people were a subsample of the analysis cohort for initial vaccination.

Exposures definitions

In the analysis with cohort 1 (all pregnant people), vaccination status is the key exposure category. In the analysis with cohort 2 (all vaccinated females), pregnancy is the key exposure category.

Outcomes definitions

Our first coprimary outcome was incident and breakthrough COVID-19 infections among vaccinated and unvaccinated people, respectively. Our incident or breakthrough COVID-19 positivity definition only included positive results based on: (1) PCR-positivity, (2) antigen-positivity or (3) ICD diagnosis condition, in that hierarchical order.24 Breakthrough infection was defined by incident COVID-19 positivity after 14 days of the last vaccine received for initial/booster vaccination.2 22

Our second coprimary outcome was severe COVID-19 infections. We defined severe COVID-19 infections as incident or breakthrough COVID-19 infections with hospitalisation records within 14 days before or 45 days after infections that do not overlap within 7 days before or after the recorded delivery or pregnancy end date (to avoid confounding of hospitalisation due to deliveries or other pregnancy outcomes).2 28 The concepts and codes to define COVID-19 infections and hospitalisations can be found in online supplemental table 1.

Person-time at-risk for vaccinated people accrued from 14 days after their last date of vaccination (initial/booster) until the earliest date of COVID-19 incident or severe infections, death, transfer to hospice or the date of their last record in N3C. Person-time at-risk for unvaccinated pregnant people accrued similarly from 14 days after the proxy initial or booster vaccination date. More details on person-time at risk are illustrated in online supplemental figure 1. In the comparison of pregnant people with booster vaccinations versus those with full initial vaccinations, we used the full initial vaccination date plus 90 days as the start date to calculate person-time-at-risk for pregnant people without booster vaccinations to avoid ascertainment bias. The 90-day time window was based on the definition of booster vaccinations, as mentioned in the previous section.

Other outcomes included (1) ICU admission within 45 days after COVID-19 infection; (2) severe COVID-19 disease with invasive ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) treatment within 45 days after COVID-19 infection and (3) 30-day mortality after COVID-19 infection.2 29 Note that ICU admission, ventilation and ECMO outcomes are hospital based and, therefore, subsumed in the second coprimary outcome of severe COVID-19 infection.

Statistical analysis

We present summary characteristics at the time of the first initial COVID-19 vaccination date and proxy vaccination date for vaccinated and unvaccinated people, respectively. We used descriptive statistics only for outcomes with low counts in various groups.

We applied Cox proportional hazard models to estimate adjusted HRs (aHR) with 95% CIs. We clustered SEs at data partner sites to account for heterogeneity across sites. We adjusted for individual-level sociodemographic characteristics, including age, race, ethnicity, specific clinical comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index and whether people had any prior COVID-19 infections before initial/booster or proxy vaccinations.

We stratified the models by the variant predominance periods (ie, pre-Delta, Delta and Omicron) to allow for different HR estimations during our observation period, and we assessed model assumptions accordingly. Person-time at-risk was also calculated for each variant stratum (ie, one within each stratum). We further separated the analysis for initial and booster vaccinations.

Of note, given the timing of booster vaccinations occurring mainly during the Omicron period, we only analysed booster vaccinations during the Omicron period. Since we anticipated pregnant people to possibly undergo more frequent COVID-19 testing than non-pregnant people (eg, for the delivery hospitalisation), we conducted an a priori sensitivity analysis restricting non-pregnant people in cohort 2 to people with at least one recorded COVID-19 test. Due to the concern of different effectiveness of mRNA and non-mRNA vaccines,30 we additionally conducted sensitivity analyses only including people with mRNA vaccinations (ie, Pfizer and Moderna).

Details about covariates and modelling can be found in online supplemental materials. All analyses were conducted in the N3C Data Enclave using PySpark and SparkR/R.31

Patient and public involvement

This is a retrospective observational study, patients were not involved.

Results

Cohort characteristics

A total of over 12 million people had records included in N3C from 10 December 2020 to 7 June 2022 (figure 1). We included 301 107 people in cohort 1 and 934 337 people in cohort 2.

Among cohort 1 (pregnant people), 34 907 (11.6%) had any initial vaccination during pregnancy, another 34 538 (11.5%) had all initial vaccinations before pregnancy and 231 662 (76.9%) did not have any COVID-19 vaccinations recorded (table 1). The median age was around 32.0 years for pregnant people with vaccinations and 30.2 (IQR 25.0–33.8) for those without vaccination. Among those who had any initial vaccination during pregnancy, 28 537 (81.8%) had full initial vaccinations, 8415 (24.1%) had booster vaccination and 25 540 (73.2%) had received a Pfizer vaccine for their first dose. Among those who had all initial vaccinations before pregnancy, 31 530 (91.6%) had full initial vaccination, 14 730 (42.6%) had booster vaccination and 23 547 (68.2%) had received a Pfizer vaccine for their first dose.

Table 1
|
Characteristics of included people in N3C cohort, 10 December 2020–7 June 2022

Among cohort 2 (vaccinated females), 864 892 (92.6%) were non-pregnant vaccinated females (table 1). The characteristics of the vaccinated pregnant groups were the same as above for cohort 1. Among vaccinated non-pregnant females, the median age was 37.1 (IQR 28.1–47.2) years, 765 929 (88.6%) had full initial vaccinations, 460 967 (53.3%) had booster vaccination and 576 921 (66.7%) had received a Pfizer vaccine for their first dose.

Cohort 1 findings: pregnant people with initial vaccinations had a lower risk of incident COVID-19 infections compared with unvaccinated pregnant people during pre-Delta and Delta periods, and they had a lower risk of severe infections consistently throughout the pandemic stages

In cohort 1, 4323 (12.4%) and 4577 (13.3%) of pregnant people with initial vaccinations during and before their pregnancy had incident COVID-19 infections across the entire study period, and 352 (1.0%) and 185 (0.5%) of them had severe COVID-19 infections, respectively. Among unvaccinated pregnant people, 39 313 (17.0%) had incident COVID-19 infections and 3868 (1.7%) developed severe COVID-19 infections (table 1).

The adjusted models for incident COVID-19 infections resulted in aHRs of 0.36 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.51), 0.77 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.96), 0.88 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.07) comparing pregnant people with any initial vaccination during their pregnancy with unvaccinated pregnant people during the pre-Delta, Delta and Omicron periods, respectively (table 2). For severe COVID-19 infections, the aHRs were 0.65 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.90) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.21) for the same group during the Delta and Omicron periods, respectively. The model results for both coprimary outcomes for pregnant people with initial vaccinations before their pregnancy and unvaccinated pregnant people were similar.

Table 2
|
Risk of breakthrough or incident and severe COVID-19 infections among pregnant people (cohort 1) by vaccination status and variant predominant periods in N3C cohort, 10 December 2020–7 June 2022

Compared with unvaccinated pregnant people, the aHR of incident COVID-19 infections for those with booster vaccinations during their pregnancy was 0.52 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.58) during the Omicron period, and the aHR of severe COVID-19 infections was 0.35 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.54). The result of the comparison between unvaccinated pregnant people and pregnant people with booster vaccinations before their pregnancy was similar. In addition, compared with pregnant people with full initial vaccinations during their pregnancy, the aHR of incident COVID-19 infections for pregnant people with booster during their pregnancy was 0.64 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.71), and the aHR of severe COVID-19 infections was 0.35 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.50).

Cohort 2 findings: pregnant people had a lower risk of COVID-19 infections but a higher risk of severe COVID-19 infections compared with vaccinated non-pregnant people during the Delta and Omicron periods

In cohort 2, among vaccinated non-pregnant females, 159 106 (18.4%) had breakthrough COVID-19 infections during the entire study period, of whom 3717 (0.43%) developed severe COVID-19 infections (table 1).

For breakthrough COVID-19 infections, the aHRs were 0.92 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.40), 0.79 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.91), and 0.61 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.69) comparing pregnant people with initial vaccinations during their pregnancy with vaccinated non-pregnant people for the pre-Delta, Delta and Omicron periods, respectively (table 3). For the same comparison, the aHRs for severe COVID-19 infections were 3.25 (95% CI 1.76 to 5.99) and 2.71 (95% CI 1.31 to 5.60) during the Delta and Omicron periods, respectively. The adjusted aHRs of breakthrough and severe COVID-19 infections for pregnant people with initial vaccinations before their pregnancy versus vaccinated non-pregnant people were similar.

Table 3
|
Risk of breakthrough or incident and severe COVID-19 infections among vaccinated people (cohort 2) by pregnancy status and variant predominant periods in N3C cohort, 10 December 2020–7 June 2022

Compared with non-pregnant people with booster vaccinations, the aHRs for breakthrough infections during the Omicron period were 0.79 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.89) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.84) for pregnant people with booster vaccinations during and before their pregnancy, respectively. Furthermore, the aHRs for severe COVID-19 infections was 3.43 (95% CI 2.59 to 4.55) comparing non-pregnant people with booster vaccinations and pregnant people with booster vaccinations during their pregnancy.

More descriptive results on person-time at risk distribution, the timing of vaccinations and incident/breakthrough infections can be found in online supplemental figures 2–7. Full primary model results can be found in online supplemental tables 2 and 3. The sensitivity analyses limiting the cohort to only people with at least one recorded COVID-19 test or those vaccinated receiving only mRNA vaccines showed similar results as our main analysis (online supplemental tables 4 and 5). Descriptive numbers of included people stratified by pre-Delta, Delta and Omicron predominant periods can be found in online supplemental table 6.

Discussion

In the US nationally sampled cohort study, pregnant people who had initial vaccinations during or before their pregnancy were at a lower risk of incident and severe COVID-19 infection compared with unvaccinated pregnant people before the Omicron period. This reduction was more pronounced for severe COVID-19 infections with greater protection during the Delta period (nearly 60% lower risk for pregnant people with initial vaccination during pregnancy). The protective effect of initial vaccinations appeared to decrease during the Omicron period. However, booster vaccinations further protected pregnant people from incidents and severe COVID-19 infections during the Omicron period compared with both unvaccinated and initial series only vaccinated pregnant people. Additionally, although vaccinated pregnant people did not appear to be at higher risk for incident COVID-19 infections compared with vaccinated non-pregnant females, they did face a higher risk of severe COVID-19 infections. Our findings suggested that vaccinated pregnant people continued to be at higher risk for severe COVID-19 infections and should be considered a priority population for further booster vaccinations. We also suggest pregnant people seek medical attention if they experience symptoms of COVID-19.

COVID-19 vaccination is advantageous for various groups of people to reduce the risk of incident and severe COVID-19 infections,2 29 and booster vaccinations could further protect pregnant people after initial vaccinations.31–33 This observation holds for pregnant people, as we and others have found. Simultaneously, there are reassuring data on the COVID-19 vaccine safety profile for maternal and newborn outcomes among pregnant people, as demonstrated by others and our team.16 17 34 Our results suggest that vaccination during pregnancy or before the pregnancy could both be effective for preventing incident and severe COVID-19 infections. Thus, pregnant people (or those intending a pregnancy soon), their providers and policy-makers should feel confident in concluding that the currently known benefits of vaccination outweigh any known or hypothetical risks.

Our study also provides unique findings to date. We found a higher risk of severe COVID-19 infection post-COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant versus non-pregnant people considering both initial vaccinations and booster vaccinations people across the pandemic stages. This higher risk may largely be driven by the underlying risk of COVID-19 infection severity among pregnant people, which is consistent with the findings from other studies.22 35 Relative to published reports, our study accounted for the potential variations in COVID-19 infection risk by the stage of the pandemic, the vaccination timing relative to the pregnancy and vaccination status (full initial vs booster). Though our data suggested that the monovalent boosters were less protective against incident COVID-19 infections during the Omicron predominance period than vaccinations for prior variants periods (30% vs 60% risk reduction), our data demonstrate that booster, monovalent vaccinations still offered protection for vaccinated pregnant people. Bivalent booster vaccinations are hoped to offer even greater protection for pregnant people. We aim to better adjudicate booster vaccination effectiveness once more such records accrue in N3C.

Despite being the largest and first study of its kind, our study faces several limitations. (1) As with any dataset composed of EHR data, the risk of misclassification and the rate of missingness is high. We believe that the vaccination rates are likely under-reported in N3C,24 a non-differential misclassification biasing our results towards the null. By excluding data partner sites that reported vaccination rates less than the lowest quartile, we hope to have minimised potential bias from this misclassification. (2) Pregnant people may have received more frequent testing or more frequent monitoring for incident or severe COVID-19 infections than non-pregnant people. We attempted to ascertain this potential source of bias via a sensitivity analysis limiting the analytical group to only people with at least one COVID-19 test result recorded, and the attenuated point estimates still suggested similar findings. (3) Hospitalisation rates are high within our pregnant cohorts, likely due to confounding of hospitalisation due to delivery. To address this issue, we defined severe COVID-19 infections as any COVID-19-related hospitalisation but not within 7 days of delivery. Relatedly, the overall rates of other severe COVID-19 outcomes are, fortunately, rare in this dataset, which could be secondary to under-reporting. (4) As with all N3C data, source validation is not possible; our attempts at phenotyping the study population, healthcare sites, exposures and outcomes have been established in other validated studies or published previously with N3C data.2 23 (5) As this is a retrospective cohort study, we are not able to obtain information about the way that COVID-19 testing was implemented. To address the potential bias in COVID-19 testing, we conducted a sensitivity analysis by limiting our dataset to only those with at least one COVID-19 test record. Notwithstanding these limitations, our work presents some of the most compelling data to date on understanding the real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness through various variant periods among pregnant people.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we find that pregnant people who are vaccinated during or before their pregnancy had a lower risk of developing incident or severe COVID-19 infection compared with unvaccinated pregnant people, and booster vaccinations could provide further protection for pregnant people during the Omicron period after the initial series of vaccinations. However, vaccinated pregnant people still face a higher risk of severe COVID-19 infection postvaccination compared with vaccinated non-pregnant females. Thus, pregnant people should continue to get vaccinated to protect against COVID-19 infections and should be considered a priority population for booster vaccinations. With increasingly reassuring data of no known adverse maternal or infant outcomes associated with COVID-19 vaccinations, pregnant people and their providers should feel confident about pursuing vaccinations during pregnancy.