Discussion
These findings indicate that participants had a low level of awareness of PrEP (7.8%). The low awareness of PrEP among this group of WWID is consistent with other studies among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Americas.34 35 However, this contrasts with a recent study that found a high PrEP knowledge (64%) among MSM in Kenya.36 The low level of awareness of PrEP may be attributed to the dearth of initiatives designed to increase PrEP knowledge in this group. Other reasons such as HIV-associated stigma, inadequate knowledge of healthcare providers and limited access to healthcare services may have contributed to the lack of awareness and understanding of PrEP among the participants. Some of these factors have been identified as barriers to PrEP knowledge in previous studies.35 36 The low PrEP awareness may also reflect PrEP marketing strategies which have traditionally targeted other MARP, especially MSM, leading to misperceptions about the appropriateness of PrEP for WWID.37
This study also found that healthcare providers (39.4%) and friends/acquaintances (36.3%) were the key sources of awareness about PrEP. The observation is in tandem with results from studies conducted in the USA, Thailand and Nigeria where health workers were found to have high knowledge of PrEP38–40 and other studies conducted in the USA where peer education was found to be a useful tool in increasing awareness of PrEP among PWID.41 The observation that healthcare workers were a key source of awareness of PrEP information among participants could be important in designing interventions to increase PrEP awareness among WWID in Nigeria in the future. These interventions could make use of available social networks to set up drug harm reduction programmes such as needle and syringe exchange programmes and medication-assisted treatment programmes which have been found to be effective means of spreading messages about PrEP in the USA.41 There could also be provision of PrEP services to PWID in Nigeria through peer-led approaches that address structural barriers in the PWID community.
We also observed that age was linked with awareness of PrEP in this population with better awareness of PrEP among respondents older than 30 years. This observation agrees with studies conducted among MSM in Ghana and Malaysia but is in contrast with one conducted in Uganda where increased age was not found to be associated with better awareness of PrEP.42–44 Our findings also agree with results from a study conducted in India which showed that despite the availability of PrEP through the private sector since year 2016, PrEP had only been recently added as part of a public sector National AIDS Control Programme with less than 10% PrEP awareness reported in key populations.45 Factors such as exposure to online sources of information about PrEP and exposure to HIV prevention educational interventions targeted at younger persons in Nigeria may have contributed to this observation among participants.
Another key finding from our study was that secondary school educational status of respondents was an important predictor of awareness and willingness to use PrEP. This agrees with the outcome of a study where educational status of participants influenced both the awareness and willingness to use PrEP.34 This observation may be related to the use of English language as the means of communication in many HIV-prevention programmes in Nigeria thereby conferring some advantage on participants with higher educational attainment and greater proficiency in the language.
This study also showed a high willingness to take PrEP (84.8%) among participants which agrees with reports of high willingness to use PrEP among PWID in other countries despite low levels of knowledge.45–47 It also agrees with a previous study in which WWID who had engaged in transactional sex, had STIs and shared injection needles had higher odds of being willing to take PrEP because they believed that they could be at greater HIV risk.46 It is noteworthy that although our study did not observe a statistically significant difference in PrEP uptake among the employed in comparison with unemployed participants, previous studies in Nigeria have shown that the cost of PrEP could be a barrier to its uptake among MSM.41 42 In addition, a multicountry study among MSM in India, Myanmar, Vietnam and Malaysia indicated that over half of PWID and MSM reported willingness to use PrEP, with a higher percentage of MSM than PWID expressing willingness to use. The low level of awareness but higher willingness to use PrEP among participants in this survey also agrees with our results.48
It is important to consider the context in comparing some of our findings with others. For example, currently, PrEP medication is dispensed in interventions as part of the Nigerian HIV Prevention Plan in six outreach centres and three field hospitals managed by health development partners and the local NGO, Heartland Alliance in Lagos State. The medication is supplied free of charge to participants recruited as part of this programme and dispensed by designated individuals in quantities expected to be sufficient until the participant’s next visit, which is usually 90 days. They are also required to retrieve and come along with used drug bottles at each visit which allows reconciliation and updating of records. Although PrEP medications are also available at some cost in private and public hospital pharmacies, providers are reluctant to share information or offer it to their clients due to the associated stigma. However, Thailand, a country with an identical history of the HIV epidemic has a longer history of PrEP use among high-risk populations with a rollout in the year 2014 compared with Nigeria which commenced much later. In addition, PrEP services in Thailand are designed to reduce stigma and discrimination to the barest minimum with the service being entirely free of charge under the universal health coverage which commenced in 2021.49 50 In contrast, although PrEP administration for HIV prevention in the USA commenced in the year 2012, there are some disparities related to its use especially among MSM of colour.51 In addition, PrEP use in the USA is largely user-driven which sometimes affects the willingness of PWID to initiate therapy because of variations in perceived HIV risk.52 53 These social and individual factors limit the extent to which our findings in Nigeria can be compared with what is obtained in other countries. The Nigerian context might affect any useful comparison of our findings with studies in the USA and Thailand because under the Same-Sex Marriage Prohibition Act, provision of services to MSM is a criminal offence in Nigeria with health workers at risk of jail time without the option of fines.54 This legal barrier makes it nearly impossible to correctly estimate provision of services to MSM in the country. The differences in PrEP services available to WWID in the Nigerian context may also prevent any useful interpretation of our observations because although they are subject to discrimination; the extent of the prejudice is determined by social factors and comorbidities which may limit their ability to access PrEP services.47 55 However, we recommend that in order to maximise the possibility of PrEP uptake among WWID in Nigeria, there is a need to decentralise its administration to all the 24 LGAs in Lagos State so that other barriers to healthcare such as fear of incarceration of their children by authorities47 and the cost of transportation to centralised drug disbursement sites can be reduced in this population.56
Finally, this study revealed that 1.9% of WWID reported ever taking PrEP. This contrasts with results from a study conducted in Philadelphia, USA, where the intention to use PrEP of 88% among WWID correlated with 78% acceptance of prescription.57 The low uptake of PrEP in our study can be attributed to a variety of factors, including limited awareness and stigma surrounding HIV infection in Nigeria. Addressing these challenges by implementing evidence-based intervention strategies such as health education, capacity building and counselling which have been found to be useful in similar settings could therefore be crucial in promoting wider adoption of PrEP for HIV prevention among PWID in the country.58–60
Limitations of the study
Our results should be viewed considering some limitations. First, it is difficult to access WWID in population-based studies due to legal and stigma issues in Nigeria. Therefore, our estimates may not be generalisable. In addition, since our study was cross-sectional in nature, the associations are not necessarily temporal or indicative of a causal effect. Moreover, our variables were based on self-reporting by WWID and may therefore have been subjected to socially desirable responses or recall bias. Finally, requiring that potential participants undertake an HIV test may have been a barrier to some participants especially those who did not want to be tested. The participant population may have comprised mostly of persons who thought they were at lower risk of HIV infection or were comfortable enough to know their status. To mitigate this limitation, we had discussions with the community contacts, shooting gallery leaders and potential participants to educate them about the potential benefit of post-test counselling and treatment.
Conclusions
Our study concludes that some specific groups/demographics of WWID would benefit more from additional interventions to promote PrEP. Provision of such as persons who have less than secondary school education and are older than 30 years with health education and information on the effectiveness of PrEP and providing easy access to services could lead to higher PrEP uptake. Furthermore, we recommend that our observations should be integrated into routine health services as an avenue of improving PrEP awareness among WWID in addition to general dissemination of other risk reduction information among PWID in Nigeria.