Introduction
Beginning in January 2021, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) began COVID-19 outbreak surveillance in collaboration with provinces and territories (PTs).1 The responsibility for delivering health services, including public health services, lies with provincial and territorial governments; federal public health surveillance relies on PT participation. The Canadian COVID-19 Outbreak Surveillance System (CCOSS) aimed to monitor the frequency and severity (hospitalisation and deaths) of outbreak events by setting, using data contributed by eight PTs.2
Children and youth were identified as a population of interest for SARS-CoV-2 infection during development and implementation of CCOSS. There were concerns that SARS-CoV-2 may lead to increased hospitalisation for this population, as those aged younger than 5 years are susceptible to other respiratory illnesses such as influenza.3 Furthermore, children can play a role in the transmission chain of influenza, as they experience high attack rates, prolonged viral shedding and have very dense social networks characterised by close contacts.4 5
A report of the special task force led by the Chief Science Advisor of Canada on COVID-19 and Children, published in July 2020, found that many science gaps remain for fully understanding COVID-19 in children that should be urgently addressed through research and systematic data gathering. COVID-19 outbreak surveillance in school settings aims to leverage the collection of better and broader data, including prevalence studies and systematic observations in day camps, daycare facilities and schools.6
School and childcare settings are integral to communities; they provide a safe learning environment for children and employment for teachers and staff.7 Certain schools and childcare programmes provide additional services to children, including meal programmes, mental health services, and social and physical activities.7–9 In the USA, reports suggest that school closures in an attempt to slow the spread of COVID-19 during the spring of 2020, may have had a negative effect on children’s learning, as well as the emotional and mental health of children and parents.7 Further, school and childcare setting closures disproportionately impacted women working from home compared with men, as women were more likely to absorb additional housework, educational support and childcare responsibilities.10 11 Additional childcare responsibilities can also impact the workforce; a study by Bayham and Fenichel found that deaths could increase with school and childcare closures due to healthcare workforce declines.12 The risk of SARS-CoV-2 spread in schools and childcare settings should be balanced against the benefits of in-person learning, caregiving needs and workforce capacity.7 12
Early in the pandemic (2020), other countries, such as Germany, analysed their surveillance data to better understand outbreaks in schools.13 Between March and August 2020, most school outbreaks were small in Germany, with few cases per outbreak; cases were primarily among older age groups who may have been staff members or other adults linked to the school outbreak.13
This paper describes the temporal outbreak trends in school and childcare settings in Canada between January 2021 and December 2021, including comparisons with overall case incidence, differences between childcare settings and types of schools (ie, primary, secondary, etc), age distribution of outbreak-associated cases, and outbreak size and severity (hospitalisation and deaths). We also review temporal relationships between public health interventions such as school closures and vaccination and outbreak incidence.