Original research

Comparing postacute care healthcare charges after hospitalisation due to influenza or COVID-19 infection in an all-payer administrative dataset in the USA: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Objective SARS-CoV-2 infection often causes a persistent syndrome of multiorgan dysfunction with symptoms that may be debilitating. Individuals seeking care for this syndrome are likely to generate significant healthcare utilisation and spending. It is unknown if healthcare costs after SARS-CoV-2 infection differ from those after influenza infection.

Methods and analysis We used an all-payer administrative dataset comprised coding and billing data from 446 hospitals in the USA that use a financial analytics platform by Strata Decision Technology. The deidentified analytical sample included patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to a hospital between July 2018 and May 2021 with an International Classification of Disease-10 code for COVID-19 or influenza. Analyses were stratified by age (18–44, 45–64 and 65+) and need for ventilation during acute hospitalisation. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between infection type (COVID-19 or influenza) and cumulative charges between 1 and 5 months after hospitalisation. Independent variables included medical comorbidities, health system classification and prehospitalisation charges, among others.

Results Of 110 381 patients included in our analysis, 94 927 (86.0%) were hospitalised for COVID-19 and 15 454 (14.0%) were hospitalised for influenza. Patients hospitalised for COVID-19 generated a median of US$5248 (inter-quartile range (IQR) US$25693) in postacute healthcare charges, whereas patients hospitalised for influenza generated a median of US$8463 (IQR US$41063). Compared with influenza, linear model results demonstrated no significant differences in postacute charges among patients hospitalised with COVID-19.

Conclusion Our findings suggest that individual healthcare expenditures after acute COVID-19 infection are not significantly different from those after influenza infection.

What is already known on this topic

  • In the wake of the pandemic, large numbers of patients have begun to seek care for long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Little is known about the implications of postviral health conditions on healthcare expenditures.

What this study adds

  • This study compares healthcare expenditures for patients hospitalised for influenza or COVID-19.

How this study might affect research, practice or policy

  • The findings in our study suggest that individual healthcare expenditures after acute COVID-19 infection are not significantly different from those after severe influenza infection. This contextualises the prevalence of symptoms after COVID-19 and may have implications about future viral pandemics.

Introduction

The long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection are likely to become a major driver of healthcare costs.1–3 Many people infected with SARS-CoV-2 have symptoms more than 4 weeks after resolution of their acute infection.4 Termed ‘Long COVID’ or ‘Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-COV-2 infection’ (PASC),5 6 this syndrome encompasses variable degrees of respiratory, cardiac, neurological, psychological and other manifestations.7–10 Determining healthcare costs after SARS-CoV-2 infection is necessary to better organise and improve care delivery for the growing number of people affected by PASC.

Since the identification of SARS-CoV-2 in 2019, a growing body of research has demonstrated both similarities and unique features of this novel respiratory virus in comparison to those more well known, such as influenza.11–13 These comparisons have been important to advance the understanding of SARS-CoV-2, by identifying the virus’ unique features and consequences. Comparing healthcare costs between patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and influenza is a complementary approach to better understand and prepare for the needs of people infected by SARS-CoV-2. Like PASC, significant long-term symptoms and healthcare needs have been demonstrated in patients after influenza and other respiratory virus infections.14–16 Yet the severity and duration of symptoms experienced by people suffering from PASC suggests that this population may have different healthcare needs.17–19 Whether and how postacute healthcare costs differ between patients hospitalised with influenza or SARS-CoV-2 has not been evaluated.

In a large, all-payer financial database from health systems across the USA, we examined healthcare costs among patients hospitalised with either influenza or SARS-CoV-2, focusing on the 6 months preceding and the 6 months following hospitalisation. Our overall objective was to identify whether and how postacute healthcare costs differ for patients infected with these two viruses.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study using an all-payer administrative database comprised of patient encounter and billing data from 96 health systems (446 total hospitals) in the USA.

Patient and public involvement

Due to deidentification of the analytical sample, patients were not involved in study design or analysis.

Data source

Strata Decision Technology provides a financial planning, analytics and performance platform used by over 400 health systems (2000 total hospitals) in the USA. A subset of these health systems use StrataJazz Decision Support and participate in the StrataSphere analytics platform, providing deidentified patient encounter and billing data that are stored in an aggregated and anonymised database of financial information. These data include patient demographics, hospital admission and discharge timestamps, healthcare facility classification, discharge disposition, medical coding (including International Classification of Disease-10 (ICD-10) diagnosis codes and Current Procedural Terminology procedure codes), and itemised charges, and are updated daily. We used the charge data within this dataset as a proxy for healthcare costs20 and intensity of healthcare use.

Study population

The study included patients aged 18 years or older who were hospitalised with a primary diagnosis of either influenza or COVID-19, according to ICD-10 diagnoses codes (J09, J10, J11 for influenza and U07.1 for COVID-19). Because the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a reciprocal decrease in influenza infections,21 22 we used asynchronous timeframes to generate cohorts for comparison (July 2018 to May 2021 for influenza, December 2019 to May 2021 for COVID-19), as seen in figure 1. Patients were excluded if any visit in the study period indicated a patient discharge code was ‘expired’ for any visit during the acute stage (n=26 134). Patients were also excluded if they were missing patient-level or hospital-level covariates (n = 2057), or if they were coinfected with influenza and COVID-19 according to ICD-10 diagnosis codes. Lastly, in order to directly compare patients with PASC to those with postviral complications from influenza, patients with no information available from the postacute stage (n=106 566) were excluded. Hospitalisation was defined by having room and board charges (based on uniform billing revenue codes between 0100 and 0179 or between 0190 and 0219) on the patient billing record.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Timeline of study period. Admissions between July 2018 and May 2021 were included for influenza, and admissions between December 2019 and May 2021 were included for COVID-19. Billed charges for all encounters within the preacute period were summed and included as a covariate for linear modelling. Billed charges for encounters within the postperiod were the primary outcome.

Periods of comparison

In order to account for each patient’s baseline healthcare utilisation and charge generation, we collected data on charges before hospitalisation. Because acute infection-related charges may occur immediately preceding and following hospital admission, the 1-month periods before and after inpatient hospital admission and discharge were considered wash-out periods for healthcare expenditures related to the acute period. Therefore, the acute stage was defined as the period from 1 month (30 days) before the admission date for the patient’s first hospitalisation for COVID-19 or influenza to 1 month after the discharge date for that visit (figure 1). Charges during the acute stage were not included in the analysis. The preacute stage was defined as the 5-month period preceding the acute stage and the post-acute stage was defined as the 5-month period following the acute stage. We chose to study 6 months after COVID-19 diagnosis (counting acute and postacute periods) to include both national and international definitions of PASC5 23 and to be consistent with prior studies documenting outcomes after influenza and COVID-19.24 25 Only patients whose date of discharge was at least 5 months before the time of the data pull were included. Per-patient preacute charges were defined as the cumulative charges accrued from visits during the preacute stage. Per-patient postacute charges were defined as the cumulative charges accrued from visits during the postacute stage.

Covariate definitions

Mechanical ventilation was identified by the presence of ICD-10 procedure codes matching 5A1935Z, 5A1945Z or 5A1955Z. Primary and secondary ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used with the Elixhauser Comorbidity Software Refined for ICD-10-CM (V.2021.1) to identify comorbidities.26 For comorbidity measures requiring the present on admission (POA) indicator for assignment, POA codes matching Y (POA) or W (clinically undetermined) were included. In-hospital mortality was identified using the CMS discharge status codes matching 20 (expired), 41 (expired in a medical facility) or 42 (expired—place unknown).

The categorisation of hospitals as urban or rural was performed using geographic information system software, which provided precise determinations that do not rely on proxies such as counties or ZIP codes. Specifically, the physical address of each entity was geolocated against the most recently available Tiger/LINE Urban Areas shapefile from the Census Bureau. Entities lying within an ‘urbanised area’ (UA) according to the US Census Bureau’s definition of a contiguously built-up area of more than 50 000 people were deemed urban (otherwise rural). Other health system and hospital characteristics such as census region, bed size and operating expense were determined using data from a third-party vendor, Definitive Healthcare. The information from Definitive Healthcare was reconciled to each health system’s general ledger departments and entities to identify individual hospitals. In cases where crosswalks were indeterminate, additional resources such as the American Hospital Directory or contacts at the health system were referenced for verification.

Analysis

Demographic data, prevalence of medical comorbidities and hospitalisation characteristics were calculated for the COVID-19 and influenza cohort. We used linear regression models to examine the relationship between infection type (COVID-19 or influenza) and cumulative post-acute healthcare charges (postacute charges) among adults in the Strata-based cohort. Postacute charges were log-transformed to meet normality assumptions for the linear models. Analyses were stratified by age group (18–44, 45–64, 65+) and receipt of mechanical ventilation during hospitalisation due to hypothesised differences in age distribution and requirement for mechanical ventilation between the COVID-19 and influenza cohorts and anticipated confounding effects of these parameters on postacute charges. Selected age groups match US Census Bureau and Department of Health and Human Services criteria for midlife27 and older28 29 adults.

Each stratified model adjusted for patient-level covariates, including gender, race and ethnicity, medical comorbidities (derived from the Elixhauser comorbidities),14 preacute charges and date of admission. Preacute charges were modelled with a jump discontinuity at zero dollars to adjust for missing preacute charge information that could be attributable to either patients having no preacute care or patients seeking preacute and acute care in different hospital systems. Interaction terms were included to accommodate differential relationships between preacute and postacute charges by infection type. Elixhauser comorbidities were grouped by organ system as follows: presence/absence of cardiovascular disease (chronic heart failure, coagulopathy, peripheral vascular disease), lung disease (pulmonary circulatory disorders, chronic pulmonary disease), cancer (leukaemia, lymphoma, metastatic cancer, carcinoma in situ, solid malignancy), diabetes (controlled diabetes, uncontrolled diabetes), hypertension (controlled hypertension, uncontrolled hypertension), liver (mild liver disease, severe liver disease), renal (moderate renal failure, severe renal failure) and obesity.

All models also adjusted for characteristics of the patient’s acute hospital stay, including hospital census region, hospital bed size, urban hospital site, hospital system operating expense (over/under US$1 billion), admission date and length of stay (LOS) of patient’s first acute visit. Admission date was centred to January 2020 for analysis, and was modelled with a spline (knots at July 2019 and July 2020) to accommodate a potentially non-linear relationship between time and charges. Due to the markedly different temporal distribution of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and the hypothesised differences in the populations susceptible to hospitalisation due to each disease, propensity score methods would not be expected to adequately balance the distribution of unobserved potential confounding variables in a way that would render inferences causal.

Results

We identified 110 381 hospitalised patients who met the cohort definition, 94 927 (86.0%) were COVID-19 hospitalisations and 15 454 (14.0%) were influenza hospitalisations (table 1). In the postacute period, the 94 927 patients hospitalised for COVID-19 accrued US$3.75 billion dollars in postacute charges (median US$5248, IQR US$25 693). The 15 454 patients hospitalised for influenza accrued US$798 million (median US$8463, IQR US$41 063).

Table 1
|
Patient and hospital characteristics before and during initial hospitalisation

Within stratified models adjusted for patient-level and hospital-level covariates, postacute charges were not significantly different among patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and patients hospitalised with influenza. Figure 2 shows the per-patient ratio of charges after COVID-19 hospitalisation to charges after influenza hospitalisation. For each stratum, estimated charges for postacute care after COVID-19 hospitalisation was not significantly different from spending after influenza hospitalisation. Within the 18–44 age group, the estimated ratio of postacute COVID-19 charges to postacute influenza charges was 1.17 (0.92–1.48) within the not mechanically ventilated stratum, and 0.48 (0.16–1.46) within the mechanically ventilated stratum. Within the 45–64 age group, the estimated ratio of postacute COVID-19 charges to postacute influenza charges was 1.08 (0.94–1.24) within the not mechanically ventilated stratum, and 0.66 (0.36–1.19) within the mechanically ventilated stratum. Within the 65+ age group, the estimated ratio of postacute COVID-19 charges to postacute influenza charges were 1.11 (0.99–1.25) within the not mechanically ventilated stratum, and 1.27 (0.63–2.55) within the mechanically ventilated stratum.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Ratio of per-patient total charges post-COVID-19 hospitalisation relative to postinfluenza hospitalisation. (A) Ratios and CIs of per-patient charges post-COVID-19 hospitalisation relative to postinfluenza hospitalisation are graphically presented for each stratum. A ratio >1 indicates higher per-patient postacute charges for COVID-19 hospitalisations relative to influenza hospitalisations in the stratum. (B) Sample size, ratios of per-patient post-COVID-19 hospitalisation relative to postinfluenza hospitalisation, CIs and p values are presented for each stratum.

Among non-mechanically ventilated patients, every comorbidity was significantly associated with postacute charges. Obesity was associated with lower postacute charges whereas the other comorbidity groups were associated with higher postacute charges. Among most age groups, cancer, cardiovascular disease and renal disease were most strongly associated with higher postacute charges. Non-urban hospital type and hospitals with lower operating expenses were associated with lower postacute charges in the 45–64 and 65+ age groups. Black patients had higher postacute charges and Hispanic patients had lower postacute charges relative to white patients controlling for all other covariates.

Among the mechanically ventilated patients, cancer, lung disease, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and renal disease were associated with higher post-acute charges in at least one age group. Obesity was associated with lower postacute charges among adults aged 45–64. Non-urban hospital type was associated with lower postacute charges among adults aged 18–44. Black race was not associated with differential postacute charges among mechanically ventillated patients, and Hispanic ethnicity was associated with lower postacute charges among adults aged 45–64. Full model results for all fully adjusted models are included in online supplemental tables S1 and S2.

To account for the possibility that patients were hospitalised in a health system that is different from where they received preacute and postacute healthcare, we conducted a sensitivity analysis excluding patients without any known prior contact in the healthcare system before hospitalisation. In this sensitivity analysis, postacute charges among patients hospitalised with COVID-19 remained similar to those among patients hospitalised with influenza. Full results of this analysis can be found in online supplemental table 3.

Discussion

To identify whether and how postacute healthcare costs differ for patients infected with COVID-19 and influenza, we examined and compared postacute healthcare charges in a cohort of adults hospitalised for influenza or SARS-CoV-2. In an all-payer database of patients seen at 446 hospitals across the USA, we found that postacute healthcare charges generated by people hospitalised for influenza were not significantly different compared with expenditures generated by patients hospitalised for SARS-CoV-2.

Our findings demonstrate the substantial and prolonged impact of viral respiratory infections on healthcare utilisation and highlight the financial impact of postacute sequalae of COVID-19 public health crisis over the study period. Since 2018, over six times more patients were hospitalised for COVID-19 than for influenza, and COVID-19 hospitalisations accounted for nearly five times more total postacute healthcare charges than influenza hospitalisations. This finding demonstrates the health systems financial impact of COVID-19. Previous work comparing acute viral infections has shown that compared with influenza, COVID-19 infection leads to a 2.9-fold higher risk of death, a 2.4-fold increased risk of mechanical ventilation, a 1.5-fold increase risk of admission to the ICU and a 1.5-fold increase LOS.30 31 Our cohort exhibited these same characteristics, with the COVID-19 group demonstrating a 1.7-fold increased risk of mechanical ventilation and a 1.67-fold increase in LOS. However, we sought to compare expenditure after COVID-19 and influenza at equivalent levels of disease severity during hospitalisation, and therefore, stratified by age and mechanical ventilation. Markers of disease severity such as LOS were included in our model and were associated with increased postacute healthcare expenditures within our model in most age groups. Therefore, our finding of no significant difference in healthcare expenditures after influenza and COVID-19 should be interpreted in the context of normalised disease severity in the analytical method.

Our findings that both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 infections are associated with significant postacute healthcare costs suggests an unmet need to address the broader impact of postviral syndromes.32 The severity of postviral syndromes from viruses such as influenza have been underappreciated by healthcare providers and policies before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.33 Globally, policy-makers are crafting responses to the long-term health effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.34 35 The findings of this study suggest that there is a need to expand these policies to support individuals recovering from other viral infections. Our findings underscore the importance of research on the pathophysiological mechanisms of PASC and other postviral syndromes.36 Furthermore, our data may support reframing research about the healthcare needs of people following SARS-CoV-2 infection in the broader context of other severe viral respiratory infections.

Strengths of this retrospective cohort study include the use of a standardised and aggregated all-payer dataset with diverse representation across geographic areas, healthcare settings and patient demographics. Strata Decision Technology collects data directly from the financial administrative system of record, enabling robust access to detail patient-level healthcare charge information. Limitations include use of billing codes for diagnoses and comorbidities, which may be subject to inconsistencies. Furthermore, inability to track patients across health systems may lead to incomplete capture of charge data. Inability to track patients across health systems affects both SARS-CoV-2 and influenza patients, but SARS-CoV-2 patients may be more likely to be affected due to disruptions in healthcare delivery during the height of the pandemic. Lastly, healthcare charge dollar values do not represent what payers or patients pay. The dollar values described in this study should be used to compare between influenza and SARS-CoV-2 (as a proxy for healthcare utilisation) and should not be interpreted as costs borne by patients.

Public health efforts to improve outcomes for patients affected by endemic respiratory viruses and to prepare for future viral pandemics should account for and support postviral infection healthcare needs.

Conclusion

Persistent symptoms and health consequences after viral infections represent a significant public health concern in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study provides valuable context by contrasting healthcare expenditures in patients at risk for postacute sequelae of COVID-19 to those linked to influenza infection. The findings underscore the importance of broader consideration of postviral syndromes by researchers and public health programmes, urging a comprehensive approach towards addressing these public health challenges.